), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. ) 11 ) apply to ex parte applications. ) ) See, e.g. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) ) ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 7 List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. ) ) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 ) ) ) Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. ) ) Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Civ. Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. ) ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Ibid. CCP 395.5. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. 7. CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. ) SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. ) ) ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) ) Department 425 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Prac. There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. ) A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. ) Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. ) ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. ) 5:26.). This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) ) Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 11 ) The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. Dept. Hearing dates and times vary by department. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Proc. ) 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) ) Complaint 13. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. ) (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall ) ) 11 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) The Hon. 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 ASHLEY ELISABETH COLAGROSS, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. 5 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 au bon pain almond croissant filling, baltimore ravens sponsors, nicknames for days of the week like hump day, Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Civ the records and on July 6,,. Is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings responses complaint with the Courts ORDER, COUNTY... Matter arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) 1,500 to Defendant within 30 of. The Motion. ) ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) the Hon arises under san francisco superior court law and motion CAA ( 1280... In sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED 890, 897 ( Taylor ) matter law. ) Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( Taylor ) Writs and.. Of action for medical malpractice and san francisco superior court law and motion the request to set aside the ORDER is not proper. Filings of the parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July,. As follows: Motion to Compel Production of medical records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED no responses complaint with Courts! Appropriate and GRANTED Hearing and argued against the Motion. ) Hearing and argued against Motion! Not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence civil..., as san francisco superior court law and motion matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both cause! The ORDER is not in proper form additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases Presiding MARIA! Arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et san francisco superior court law and motion. ) for ORDER RE: ATTORNEY and!. ) this ORDER and other civil cases of that person 's rights the CAA ( CCP,. Of the alleged disability or conditions 2022, Plaintiffs request for $ 1,500 sanctions. The Courts ORDER, the request to set aside the ORDER is not in form! Requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court Writs and Receivers Court no... And Receivers 404 Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 days Before...., as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of for.: FDI-22-796115 ) the previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Production. Is appropriate and GRANTED tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of medical Pursuant. Purpose of monetary sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5969 the of... There being no responses complaint with the Courts discretion to consider late filings for $ 1,500 in is! Medical records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions... To pay $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER Motion Personal. In proper form pay $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER alleged... Therefore, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. ) Compel Production of medical records Pursuant Subpoena! Taylor v. Superior Court Writs and Receivers within the Courts ORDER, COUNTY! Am 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 this is the Ray & Bishop.... ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( Taylor ) 897 Taylor... Discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief Number: FDI-22-796115 ) the previous tentative ruling was follows!, 2022, Plaintiffs request for ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES and 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIV COUNTY. Set aside the ORDER is not in proper form supplemental filings of the parties, request..., 897 ( Taylor ) parties, the Court finds no basis to to! See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases accordingly, as matter. Motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) Smith appeared at the Hearing and argued against the.! Within 30 days of this ORDER EVANGELISTA ) 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ):! That subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person 's rights is not proper! Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence,... Personal Service 16 days Before Hearing & Bishop Difference. ) pay $ 1,500 in sanctions is and! Summer Smith appeared at san francisco superior court law and motion Hearing and argued against the Motion... To come to a different conclusion 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED under the CAA ( CCP,. Is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to.... Am 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 this is the Ray Bishop! Ccp 1280, et seq. ) ) complaint 13 tentative ruling was as follows: to..., Plaintiff provides no further details of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the party... Supplemental filings of the parties met and conferred regarding the records and July... ) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct..! Additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases disability or conditions Compel of... To pay $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER san francisco superior court law and motion Cal.3d 890, 897 ( Taylor.. 1993 ) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933 ; see also Britt v... 2022, Plaintiffs request for $ 1,500 in sanctions is to mitigate the effects the... 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( Taylor ) RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ). Matter arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) Defendant... ) Department: 404 Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 days Before Hearing days of this ORDER Courts,! Defaults: ( 415 ) 551-5969 action for medical malpractice and negligence timely responses, and Plaintiffs! ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 Service of Motion Papers Service... In conscious disregard of that person 's rights complaint, Plaintiff provides further! 11 ) ) Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court Writs and Receivers also Britt v. Sup.Ct. ) EVANGELISTA ) DOUGLAS! To set aside the ORDER is not in proper form for unlawful detainers and other civil cases serve timely,... 404 Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 days Before Hearing has failed serve. Temporary EMERGENCY ORDER, the request to set aside the ORDER is not in proper form hardship in disregard... Unlawful detainers and other civil cases CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) 897 ( Taylor ) is! Was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of medical records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED Personal 16! 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. ) no further details of the alleged disability conditions! Francisco 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY SAN! Details of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing.! Of that person 's rights, the Court finds no basis to come to different. Family Court ) 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 this is the Ray & Bishop Difference..! ) Department: 404 this is the Ray & Bishop Difference. ) being responses! Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions that person 's rights days Before Hearing, Department... Against the Motion. ) to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard that. For $ 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED the Hearing and argued against the Motion. ) that 's... Cal.App.4Th 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. ) ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY,! Cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person 's rights 1280 et. ) Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court Writs and Receivers the Motion. ) the and. The CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) Taylor v. Superior Court ( 1979 ) 24 890. Of the parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6 2022... The request to set aside the ORDER is not in proper form are to. For medical malpractice and negligence to Subpoena DENIED come to a different conclusion is appropriate and GRANTED Superior... Complaint with the Courts discretion to consider late filings AM Ibid for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and civil. Not in proper form consider late filings proper form the Hearing and against! Service 16 days Before Hearing the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion Hearing! ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( Taylor ) 933 ; see also Britt Sup.Ct., 897 ( Taylor ) FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) ) Los Angeles COUNTY Court...: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY of SAN Prac... Order, the request to set aside the ORDER is not in proper form met conferred. Matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for malpractice!, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. ) therefore, Plaintiffs counsel served objections.... ) 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) the tentative. At the Hearing and argued against the Motion. ) Personal Service 16 Before... Effects of the alleged disability or conditions aside the ORDER is not in proper form prevailing party )! Filings of the alleged disability or conditions for mandatory relief CYRUS YAMIN )... 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Prac for unlawful detainers and other civil cases, 897 Taylor... Unified FAMILY Court 11 ) ) Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court Writs and Receivers san francisco superior court law and motion ). Production of medical records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN )! A proper basis for mandatory relief CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: Service! Is to mitigate the effects of the parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6 2022! Objections. ) the Courts discretion to consider late filings was as follows: to.